|
|
Wednesday, February 13, 2002 |
|
This is something that I have been thinking a lot about recently. Would it be useful to be able to subscribe to a K-Log using your favorite IM client (AIM, ICQ, or Windows Messenger)? I think it would be. The interface would be simple. Just click an icon on the K-Log you want to subscribe to, and new posts turn up as messages in your chat window. The message would also include the information necessary to start up a chat session with the author. Authentication would be handled via buddy lists. This type of interaction gets really powerful when Web Services are used (this is a little advanced, but it points to how powerful a K-Log tool can become). For those who don't know what a Web Service is, it is simply the ability to send a question (example: what is the price of IBM stock?) to a remote machine, application, or system that returns an answer (the price is 104). Destkop K-Log tools can be simply programmed to ask that question on a periodic basis and publish the answer to the Intranet as a post to a K-Log. I recently ran example of this on my Weblog. It is a simple Web Service that generates a table of horse racing statistics from New Zealand (see: http://jrobb.userland.com/2002/02/08.html#a1176 ). The service is running on Chris Double's machine (in New Zealand) and to include it in my Weblog, all I needed to do cut and paste a simple one line "macro" to the editing box (macros are snipets of code that people often use when working with a spreadsheet, etc.). Whenever I publish my Weblog, my desktop Weblog tool asks his desktop Weblog tool what the latest statistics are. The results are sent to me and updated on my site. Now, it is easy to see how this could extend to corporate K-Logs. I could easily include macros that would ask the corporate sales system (via Web Services) to send me all new sales over $5,000 (the data returned would include the date, the amount of the sale, the customer name, the salesperson, and any comments). I could ask my K-Log tool to ask the system my question every hour and publish it to a category on my K-Log called "sales." I could even post an annotation to that new data by editing the automated post. So, now that the information is published to my K-Log as a category specific site, it is possible for people to subscribe to this "sales" newsfeed. If tied to an IM system, subscribers could get a report on news sales sent to them as an instant message. Hopefully, you can see the power and the flexibility in this arrangement. However, it is clearly an advanced extension of K-Logs into automated data streams. This could yield excellent results given that control of this information is in the hands of end-users -- where it belongs. [John Robb's Radio Weblog] Now this puts the IM question John raises in more context (the heart of KM challenges). I still think that IM's role is more likely to be one of access to the resident expert on demand. The design challenge is how to use IM for very low-frequency, very high-value messages. Otherwise, you get swamped with message traffic and are likely to miss what's important. It does make me think that one of the things we need to do in the KM arena is equip people to make more mindful media choices on a moment to moment basis |
|
Interesting. The poll I just put up on the K-Logs group is getting mixed results. It asks, would the ability to subscribe to K-Log (corporate knowledge management Weblog) via instant messaging be useful? I think it really depends on whether you use instant messaging. John, I use IM regularly, but I'm not sure that I would want to use it as an incoming source. If I'm already doing a k-log, then why would I prefer IM over something like Radio's news aggregator? I'd fear getting buried under an avalanche of IMs. IM certainly has a place in the knowledge management equation. If you need a quick chat with an expert to put something in context, it's great. The mixed results you're getting in the poll (I voted against IM) are more a function of fuzziness on how IM might fit into k-logging, than they are a lack of experience with IM. IMHO. |
|
While I was sleeping. [Matthew Thomas notwithstanding I can't ignore the now raging CSS debate.] During all my (well-documented) attempts at producing a table-free Radio site, I thought the advantages of CSS were self-evident. I awoke to discover that Dave remains unconvinced:
That's unambiguous. Dave's statement seems stubborn and cantankerous but it could also reflect his preference for the imperfect solution that works now over the perfect solution that requires changes to tried-and-tested working methods. Though it's at odds with my fundamental perception of Dave: that he's intellectually curious, open to new ideas, and excited by new technology. Perhaps that's why he links to Zeldman, James Spahr, Owen Briggs, Dave Polaschek, Dave Dombrowski, Austin Burbridge, John Brooks, Brent Simmons -- each of whom argues persuasively in favor of using CSS for layout. Dave asks for a designer to write a Table-less CSS Templates for Newbies. Tony Collen has responded with a CSS Koolaid for Newbies, a succinct overview of the CSS vs. Tables issue that's a great starting point for anyone wanting to learn more. One plausible explanation for what's going down at Scripting News might be that Dave realizes the importance of CSS and is using his considerable skills as a flowmeister to publicize the issue and, in doing so, expose Radio users to the benefits of "[separating] data from layout at a code level" as Owen Briggs puts it so neatly. Well, whatever it takes to skin the cat is fine by me. I suppose I need to understand this at some point. Certainly provoking lots of passion. |
|
This may be enough to get me to give up caller id and start answering those telemarketing calls. From Steve Vore. |
|
Roger Schank on Storytelling as a Curriculum Framework. Quote: "Once upon a time there was a kingdom that was overrun with dragons. The people were terrorized by the dragons so they decided to build a new curriculum in their finest university to train young warriors in the art of dragon slaying" I think the key to understanding Roger's point of view is that he's interested in whether people develop skills to do something useful, which is not generally part of the equation in a lot of educational settings. |


