|
|
Thursday, July 25, 2002 |
Very well thought out series of posts on blogging in education that also apply in other settings. I'll be referring to these frequently. |
Something to follow up on. The first edition of Information Architecture for the World Wide Web was great and I already have an order in for the second edition. |
|
I've now gotten ActiveRenderer working here. I shot myself in the foot once or twice with the install and it took a bit of tinkering before I grasped how it all fit together. Definitely a keeper. I'll continue to make more use of it as time goes on. Right now it's managing the outline format of the home page here, as well as the blogroll on the left and the current interests section on the right. Thanks Marc for a great addition to my toolkit! |
Interesting interview with Winograd about how technology interacts with use and with business opportunities. Worth thinking about. |
One of the curious features of the Internet bubble was how visible everything was. Gross seems a perfect example of Linus Pauling's observation that "the best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas." |
Another of the Dave's in the must read, must pay attention to category. Actually here we have Dave Weinberger pointing to David Isenberg. Then we've got David Reed, Dave Winer, Doc Searls. Are there others? Maybe I should change my name? |
According to a study by McKinsey, Wal-Mart's effective use of information technology has been one of the core drivers of productivity growth in the U.S. economy. As Phil Windley points out, it isn't fashionable to talk about centralization of information and information systems. The reason it isn't is that it's devilishly hard to do at all, much less do well. However, if you look at the organizations that have succeeded with making IT an integral part of the business strategy, you'll find successful centralization more often than not. |
Buzz keeps encouraging me to put this on my calendar. It's tempting. |
More insights from Jon Udell. The distinction is important and Jon shows why. |
|
Paolo wonders. Paolo wonders if there is or was a rule that Web writing can't change. I responded in the comments section of his post. [Scripting News] More tempest in a teapot debates about what the "rules" of weblogginr are or aren't. But Paolo has a wonderful email "disclaimer" in his post that I want to be able to get back to later. |


