|
|
Saturday, August 07, 2004 |
|
I've been experimenting with making both of these tools part of my default environment. This is for when I need it.
|
|
I've only just begun to read through this, but it certainly appears to live up to its billing.
|
|
I find this graph alone worth thinking about. It's a potent reminder that a learner's efficiency is maximized with a Socratic strategy -- one learner, one teacher. Well done, apprenticeship is an ideal model. Most classroom settings are large compromises from that ideal -- sometimes intentionally. While, as Jay points out, cost can be a constraint in achieving the ideal, more often than not, the real constraint is failure of imagination. We expect so little of most classroom environments, that it doesn't occur to us how much more is possible. Compromise is also easier when the the perspective is to minimize training costs. The goal really ought to be maximizing performance on the job. More than that, the goal ought to be to push bring typical performance up to the level of the best performers in the organization; preferably with a strategy that is a bit more robust than mere exhortation. Are you setting the bar high enough?. "Make no little plans. They fail to stir the blood of men," said architect Daniel Burnham. Indeed, life's too short for mediocrity. When I hear someone say they wish their online learning were as effective as their instructor-led workshops, I wonder why they're shooting so low. They should be aiming to make their technology-enabled learning much better than the passive classroom experience. Let's face it, the classroom is often a mediocre learning environment. |
|
What a lovely way to start off a quiet Saturday. Lest you remain unconvinced of the innovation value of idleness, recall that both the web browser and napster were created by college students who were surely cutting classes at the time.
|



