|
|
Friday, March 04, 2005 |
|
Some useful advice worth passing along. Here's hoping you never have cause to take advantage of it. I just received this form a good friend. I know this is a bit off topic but ID theft is becoming a huge problem.
I’ve read some sobering stories about the devastation having your identity hijacked can wreak. Here’s some excellent
advice from an attorney about how you can protect yourself and what to do if you become a victim. |
|
All of the Copyfight coverage of the Grokster case is worth following. This one reminds me the differing mindsets of executives and policy makers. I was lucky enough to learn strategy from Mike Porter as he was writing Competitive Strategy. His course was the hottest course at the Harvard Business School. Several years later, I went back to Harvard to get my doctorate at the Business School. As part of that process I took the basic course in Industrial Economics from Richard Caves who was Porter's thesis advisor and learned that Porter was possibly even more clever than I already thought. Porter's fundamental insight was to take the academic research field of Industrial Economics and invert it. Industrial Economics studies the question of market failures. What conditions lead to markets that don't conform to the economic ideal of perfect competition? What conditions make monopolies and oligopolies likely? The economists study this area with an eye toward what public policies are useful and necessary to maintaining competition in its close to ideal form. Porter's genius was to see that an economists' market failure was a CEO's wet dream. Competitive strategy could be viewed as an effort to create market failures. This is what executives are trained to do and rewarded for. Absent the appropriate policy checks and balances, you end up with the world that the RIAA and MPAA hope to preserve. Free Software Foundation tears MPAA a new one in Grokster brief. Cory Doctorow:
The Free Software Foundation and New Yorkers for Fair Use have filed a
brief in Grokster, EFF's Supreme Court case to establish the legality
of P2P networks. Eben Moglen, the author of the brief, really lights
into the RIAA and MPAA -- he's a fantastic writer:
At the heart of Petitioners' argument is an arrogant and unreasonable claim--even if made to the legislature empowered to determine such a general issue of social policy--that the Internet must be designed for the convenience of their business model, and to the extent that its design reflects other concerns, the Internet should be illegal. |


