<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fact-based or ideology-based thinking: Go watch &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/06/03/fact-based-or-ideology-based-thinking-go-watch-an-inconvenient-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/06/03/fact-based-or-ideology-based-thinking-go-watch-an-inconvenient-truth/</link>
	<description>"The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity." - Dorothy Parker</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/06/03/fact-based-or-ideology-based-thinking-go-watch-an-inconvenient-truth/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/?p=26#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Isn't putting the words "think" and "Fox News" together in the same sentence a particularly extreme example of an oxymoron?

Most of those who try to undermine inconvenient facts do so by operating entirely on an emotional/ideological level, with no thought apparent at all. Regardless of the conclusion you reach on any particular topic, the tendency to substitute ideology and blind belief for careful, logical thought seems to me to pose a serious threat to any democracy. The first action of most dictators is to remove "intellectuals" who question the prevailing orthodoxy.

The business equivalent is blind adherance to "industry best practice" and conventional management "wisdom" — at least 90% of which is (a) already proven not to work, and (b) a lazy substitute for thinking through the issue for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t putting the words &#8220;think&#8221; and &#8220;Fox News&#8221; together in the same sentence a particularly extreme example of an oxymoron?</p>
<p>Most of those who try to undermine inconvenient facts do so by operating entirely on an emotional/ideological level, with no thought apparent at all. Regardless of the conclusion you reach on any particular topic, the tendency to substitute ideology and blind belief for careful, logical thought seems to me to pose a serious threat to any democracy. The first action of most dictators is to remove &#8220;intellectuals&#8221; who question the prevailing orthodoxy.</p>
<p>The business equivalent is blind adherance to &#8220;industry best practice&#8221; and conventional management &#8220;wisdom&#8221; — at least 90% of which is (a) already proven not to work, and (b) a lazy substitute for thinking through the issue for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
