<?xml version="1.0" encoding="latin1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balancing diligence and laziness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/</link>
	<description>"The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity." - Dorothy Parker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hank Delisle</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-100450</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Delisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/#comment-100450</guid>
		<description>I work as an English teacher in Japan, and I’ve found in my experience that Japanese public school administrators tend to be in the “diligent and stupid” category. That’s why what passes for “education” in this country is brimming with superfluity. And when you look at what kids are rewarded and punished for in a typical Japanese school, you’ll find that diligence and stupidity tend to be rewarded, while laziness and intelligence tend to be punished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work as an English teacher in Japan, and I’ve found in my experience that Japanese public school administrators tend to be in the “diligent and stupid” category. That’s why what passes for “education” in this country is brimming with superfluity. And when you look at what kids are rewarded and punished for in a typical Japanese school, you’ll find that diligence and stupidity tend to be rewarded, while laziness and intelligence tend to be punished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;balancing diligence and laziness&#8221; &#171; the other blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-3269</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;balancing diligence and laziness&#8221; &#171; the other blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/#comment-3269</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Mr. McGee has some good things to say about the topic of creating hardworking idiots, and more intelligently than the fellow at lifehack (my apologies to him, but it&#8217;s true). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Mr. McGee has some good things to say about the topic of creating hardworking idiots, and more intelligently than the fellow at lifehack (my apologies to him, but it&#8217;s true). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGee&#8217;s Musings &#187; Being smart about when to be diligent</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>McGee&#8217;s Musings &#187; Being smart about when to be diligent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an interesting refinement on my laziness vs. diligence argument a while back. The danger is that it just becomes a slightly more clever way to reinforce the Protestant ethic&#160;Properly interpreted, however,&#160;Ballard provides a logic for making diligence pay off in compound interest terms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an interesting refinement on my laziness vs. diligence argument a while back. The danger is that it just becomes a slightly more clever way to reinforce the Protestant ethic&nbsp;Properly interpreted, however,&nbsp;Ballard provides a logic for making diligence pay off in compound interest terms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGee&#8217;s Musings &#187; Diligence vs laziness - Complexifiers vs simplifiers</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>McGee&#8217;s Musings &#187; Diligence vs laziness - Complexifiers vs simplifiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Berkun offers an alternative characterization of innovation than the diligence/laziness issue that I dicussed last month. Life is complicated enough; we don&#8217;t need more folks adding complexity just of the sake of complexity (or job security). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Berkun offers an alternative characterization of innovation than the diligence/laziness issue that I dicussed last month. Life is complicated enough; we don&#8217;t need more folks adding complexity just of the sake of complexity (or job security). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /personal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lazy = good</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>/personal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lazy = good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 05:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the <acronym title="Really Simple Syndication">RSS</acronym> 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Take Pride in your Laziness</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Take Pride in your Laziness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>[...] Loyal reader WmD sent me a link to an article about the value of laziness in a knowledge organization. Well, that&#8217;s not entirely accurate. The article espoused the belief that laziness is undervalued. Laziness coupled with intelligence is a powerful force for new and creative ideas. It is usually the lazy who provide the great innovations. The pursuit of avoiding work is one of man&#8217;s greatest passions&#8211;at least for those who get ahead, anyway. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Loyal reader WmD sent me a link to an article about the value of laziness in a knowledge organization. Well, that&#8217;s not entirely accurate. The article espoused the belief that laziness is undervalued. Laziness coupled with intelligence is a powerful force for new and creative ideas. It is usually the lazy who provide the great innovations. The pursuit of avoiding work is one of man&#8217;s greatest passions&#8211;at least for those who get ahead, anyway. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>Which reminds me of a very relevant resource for this topic - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.structuredprocrastination.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Structured Procrastination&lt;/a&gt; - which talks about how to use our tendencies to procrastinate about Task A as one motivation to attack Task B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which reminds me of a very relevant resource for this topic &#8211; <a href="http://www.structuredprocrastination.com/" rel="nofollow">Structured Procrastination</a> &#8211; which talks about how to use our tendencies to procrastinate about Task A as one motivation to attack Task B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WmD</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>WmD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2006/07/19/balancing-diligence-and-laziness/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve frequently called it &quot;proactively lazy.&quot;  If I don&#039;t want to put out the effort to perform task A with standard method B, then I&#039;ll figure out a better method C, then do that instead.

It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t want to get things done, it&#039;s more that I don&#039;t want to waste effort doing something, especially if it&#039;s a repetitive task.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve frequently called it &#8220;proactively lazy.&#8221;  If I don&#8217;t want to put out the effort to perform task A with standard method B, then I&#8217;ll figure out a better method C, then do that instead.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t want to get things done, it&#8217;s more that I don&#8217;t want to waste effort doing something, especially if it&#8217;s a repetitive task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
