<?xml version="1.0" encoding="latin-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The To-and-Fro over 2.0: It&#039;s Rematch Time!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2008/01/10/the-to-and-fro-over-20-its-rematch-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2008/01/10/the-to-and-fro-over-20-its-rematch-time/</link>
	<description>"The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity." - Dorothy Parker</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colleen Carmean</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2008/01/10/the-to-and-fro-over-20-its-rematch-time/#comment-101414</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen Carmean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2008/01/10/the-to-and-fro-over-20-its-rematch-time/#comment-101414</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim:
I think Tom's wrong, but that his case has merite because we don't yet know the effective practices or tools that will create E2.0

I'm looking into this via a dissertation research project, and I've been hunting for your email address to ask you to participate. I did a social network analysis on terms relevant to new, shared, organizational knowledge and yours is one of the 24 most trusted Blogs on the topic.

Thus, I'm hoping you'll answer a survey on what you know.
Here's link to look at on the SNA and what's being asked of participants: 
http://cmcarmean.googlepages.com/tappingknowledgeintheblogosphere

Could you email me and let me know if you'd be willing to participate? 
(I didn't intend to make such a public request, but you're hard to contact. And I didn't want to pay 19.95 / month to write you via LinkedIn ;)
Colleen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim:<br />
I think Tom&#8217;s wrong, but that his case has merite because we don&#8217;t yet know the effective practices or tools that will create E2.0</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking into this via a dissertation research project, and I&#8217;ve been hunting for your email address to ask you to participate. I did a social network analysis on terms relevant to new, shared, organizational knowledge and yours is one of the 24 most trusted Blogs on the topic.</p>
<p>Thus, I&#8217;m hoping you&#8217;ll answer a survey on what you know.<br />
Here&#8217;s link to look at on the SNA and what&#8217;s being asked of participants:<br />
<a href="http://cmcarmean.googlepages.com/tappingknowledgeintheblogosphere" rel="nofollow">http://cmcarmean.googlepages.com/tappingknowledgeintheblogosphere</a></p>
<p>Could you email me and let me know if you&#8217;d be willing to participate?<br />
(I didn&#8217;t intend to make such a public request, but you&#8217;re hard to contact. And I didn&#8217;t want to pay 19.95 / month to write you via LinkedIn <img src='http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Colleen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
